Tenna Doktor Olsen Tvedebrink & Tina Vestermann Olsen
The work of Emma Cheatle has inspired and guided development of my writing practice, and my writing of architectural history. In ‘Writing Walking: Ficto-critical Routes through Eighteenth-century London’ – published as a chapter in Writing Architectures: Ficto-Critical Approaches, a collection of wonderful, temporal and spatial, embodied and material writing edited by Hélène Frichot and Naomi Stead – Cheatle writes the historic site through writing intersecting the everyday and the intimate, the narrative and the descriptive. Cheatle feels proximate and present to the reader – careful, vulnerable, attentive, revealing – the subjects and objects of study resonate and reform on the page. I would wish to invoke similar intimacy and accuracy in my work.
In Stud: Architectures of Masculinity (1996), Joel Sanders intended to provoke and stimulate debate in the field of critical theory of and for architecture, queer space, and in the contested community of architecture, art and criticism practice. Stud demonstrates an inter-textual dialogue concerned with spaces of absence and exile, and the representation of shifting, provisional identities and images constructed between subject and object, matter and imprint. Stud challenged disciplinary boundaries. In the book’s structure, the coordinated juxtaposition of contributions from an inter-disciplinary field of authors, in its form, an exchange of ideas between image and text are offered, and in its content, the book posits questions of masculinity, gender, and sexuality on spatial, artistic, and critical terms. My work seeks to pay close attention to structure, form, and content, working across the disciplines in strategic, intersectional ways whilst remaining ‘alert to cadences’ in the discrete sites of meaning production.
In The Poetics of Space, Gaston Bachelard essays our first home and the conditioning effect upon the development of our spatial, temporal patterns of movement and positioning. Brian Dillon suggests it is the space of the home itself which plays out over time through this embodiment, ‘It is the empty volume that we get used to, that makes our bodies move in particular ways, that forms habits and physical attitudes which persist, awkwardly, after we have left.’ I return to Brian Dillon’s articulate, precise, and intimate writing frequently. In the Dark Room: A Journey in Memory, (2006) forms an unflinching examination of memory and loss, childhood and the self with poise and accuracy. It is profoundly moving writing, and a continued source of both inspiration and solace.
Simon Morris, Gill Partington & Adam Smyth (editors)
Edward Hollis & Rita Alaoui
Max Olof Carlsson Wisotsky
I want to reference three people to whom I owe heartfelt thanks, those whom have specifically informed and influenced this project and have since continued to inspire how I work and live.
I am deeply grateful for the conversations Doreen Massey and I shared before she sadly, and unexpectedly, died on 11 March 2016 (and who had generously agreed to contribute an essay to Re: development), which greatly inspired directions for this project. In particular her conception of space as ‘stories-so-far’ offered me a critical lens through which to understand – and politicise – whom this particular place, The Green Backyard and other contested spaces, belong to. Much of this material can be found in her book titled For Space, but I also want to share here a link to Doreen’s essay titled ‘Landscape/space/politics: an essay’. It was after reading this essay I plucked up the courage to speak with Doreen in the sidelines of a conference at which she spoke, which prompted her to call me up one Sunday morning and kick-started a series of meetings and discussions. In Doreen’s collaboration with Patrick Keiller I saw her enthusiasm for working with others outside and beyond academia, and it did not seem too unthinkable to hope she might consider working with me.
Doreen Massey, For Space (London: Sage, 2005).
Doreen Massey, ‘Landscape/space/politics: an essay’ (2011), accessed 8 September 2016. thefutureoflandscape.wordpress.com/landscapespacepolitics-an-essay/.
Another person I have been fortunate to come to know well during the lifetime of this project is Dougald Hine, social thinker, writer and founder of a series of projects and organisations including the literary journal Dark Mountain. In his text for Re: development, Dougald invokes the idea of ‘magic’ to reflect upon the qualities inherent in The Green Backyard, and other volunteer-run projects, by sketching out a model – beyond that of the public and private – which instead explores them within a logic of the commons. It is his three forms of language (Inward, Upward and Outward) needed by people close to a project to enable it to survive that I have continued to turn towards in times of challenge.
Dougald Hine, ‘Spelling It Out’, in Jessie Brennan, Re: development (London: Silent Grid, 2016). Accessed 31 May 2020. dougald.nu/spelling-it-out-the-three-languages-you-need-to-take-a-project-from-dreams-to-reality/
One of the people I want most to express my gratitude to is Jane Rendell. I first came to know of Jane’s fierce intellect through Art and Architecture: A Place Between. In 2016, during my visiting research fellowship at The Bartlett, UCL, where Jane was my mentor, I was fortunate enough to get to know her bright mind and witness the endless generosity with which she shares her seemingly limitless knowledge and performs daily acts of care towards her students. Reading (and writing), of course, has its own particular relational qualities, and anyone who takes the time to pick up a book or scroll through an online essay by Jane will be rewarded, but in person the theories and practices upon which such books and essays are based, really sing. In particular, Jane’s practice of ‘site-writing’, in which she interweaves analysis, autobiography, archives, socio-political issues and writing in the expanded field, directly informed my artwork If This Were to Be Lost (and to which Jane’s essay contribution for Re: development responded). More recently for me, Jane’s concept of ‘critical spatial practice’, in which such practice critiques the sites into which it intervenes, continues to help me situate my work within a striated landscape. A public art commissioning landscape in which the language of intuition and everyday usage rubs up against the language of power and resources.
Not every artist has the benefit of such a mentor and critical friendship, but every artist who has a situated practice and comes across the concepts of ‘critical spatial practice’ and ‘site-writing’ will undoubtedly be galvanized by Jane’s intellectual brilliance and generosity of knowledge, and by the feminist voice with which she speaks to the challenges of the sites, situations and situatedness in which we, as artists, architects, citizens, find ourselves.
Jane Rendell, Art and Architecture: A Place Between, (London: I.B. Tauris, 2006).
Jane Rendell, ‘This Subjunctive Mood of Mine’, in Jessie Brennan, Re: development (London: Silent Grid, 2016).
Photolanguage (Nigel Green & Robin Wilson)
Emma Cocker & Clare Thornton
Catalina Pollak Williamson / Public Interventions